Jump to content

WTF is going on with my PTC sensor?


xsherlock

Recommended Posts

I have exactly the same issue with at least 2 PTC bricklets.

One is connected 'remotely' using RS485 extensions but the

other one is local.

The issue can last for several hours (!) and I didn' find any other

workaround than resetting the Master brick the PTC bricklet is

connected to.

Sometimes, the PTC bricklet recovers by itself.

I've checked the phyiscal connections and they look good to me.

The is_sensor_connected() returns true anyway when this issue happens.

 

Is there anything else to check ?

Thanks.

Regards

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

So the wrong values disappear immediately if you restart the Master Brick? That is very strange, it implies that there is some kind of "bad state" that is lost after a restart of the Master Brick.

 

Do you have to disconnect the power or is it enough to press the reset button?

 

 

 

I don't disconnect the power, I perform the reset of the of the master brick

in the stack the faulty PTC is attached to, using the brick viewer application.

Please note that when this issue happens, the brick viewer reports the

sames temperature value for ages, which in my case does not make sense at all.

 

So, I was considering monitoring the temperature value changes over the time

in my application and perform an "automatic reset" of the master brick

but this sounds overkill to me...

Any advise would be welcome.

Thanks for your help.

Regards.

 

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good to know that it works now. As long as the resistance from the PTC sensor is in a "possible range" it can't tell that it isn't connected correctly. I think that was probably the problem here :).

So, I guess that my issue is probably different then.

As you can see in the attached screenshot, I got the issue

from 2 different PTCs (temperature value is flat for a while).

Regards.

PTCerror.png.f990e54811a7b395a8114f198ae53290.png

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

So, I guess that my issue is probably different then.

As you can see in the attached screenshot, I got the issue

from 2 different PTCs (temperature value is flat for a while).

Regards.

Indeed, that looks different. Does the flat value recover after a while or do you definitely have to reset?

 

I just looked through the code, if "is_sensor_connected()" returns true during the flat time, it means that the MAX31865 IC that we use on the PTC Bricklet does return the same resistance for the whole time.

 

If you reset the Master Brick, the MAX31865 will be reinitialized. But during initialization we only configure the default values again.

 

For testing, could you try to call "set_noise_rejection_filter" (it does not matter if you turn it on or off). Internally this will also set the whole configuration again. Does this also fix the problem?

 

If it does fix the problem, we may have to set the configuration periodically in the firmware? Sounds strange, but i currently have no other idea :).

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

I just looked through the code, if "is_sensor_connected()" returns true during the flat time, it means that the MAX31865 IC that we use on the PTC Bricklet does return the same resistance for the whole time.

 

If you reset the Master Brick, the MAX31865 will be reinitialized. But during initialization we only configure the default values again.

 

For testing, could you try to call "set_noise_rejection_filter" (it does not matter if you turn it on or off). Internally this will also set the whole configuration again. Does this also fix the problem?

 

If it does fix the problem, we may have to set the configuration periodically in the firmware? Sounds strange, but i currently have no other idea :).

Thanks for the tip, I will give it a try. Currently, I poll the PTC every 60 seconds using a small Python script based on your API examples.

I'm planning to store the values and monitor for unchanged value for a given amount of time, and then try to call the set_noise_rejection_filter() function if the value remains the same.

The issue is to be able to detect if an unchanged value is valid or not.

Regards.

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

So it seems the MAX31865 for some reason doesn't change its state anymore after a while?

 

I would say we ship you a new PTC Bricklet, but you have this exact problem with two PTC Bricklets, right?

Indeed, I have 4 PTC bricklets with PTC connected to them and 2 other bricklets

in the stack but without any sensor connected yet.

Two of them seem to have this strange behavior very often, the 2 other get it from time to time only.

BTW, I've tried to use the set_noise_rejection_filter() call but that did

not help that much so far.

Thanks for your help.

Regards.

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Still fighting with these PTC issues, I'm tracking the values and try to check for suspicious values.

I've been able to detect this morning that 2 of the 4 PTC connected to the same master brick we reporting constant and invalid values.

Reseting the master brick did clear the issue but this mechanism is not really reliable.

Regards.

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just today I got some bogus values, not absurd like previously, but for sure false.

 

The 3 PTC probes are inside the 1.2m3 of hot water tank that did not cool down magically by 6degrees for half an hour.

 

------

Ohh, that was easy, when I switch light in the basement and get this result, so that is noise from AC wire I guess.

2016-04-11_00_25_38-Main_Menu.thumb.png.28ff36cfa1afccc492f796524d730025.png

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

I just wanted to raise this subject again ... especially as I had reported the same 6 degree drop as the last poster 1.5 years ago in the German part of the forum (http://www.tinkerunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,2810.msg17826.html).

 

Even if it might be triggered by AC installations around (difficult to avoid them), is there already a known solution (Tinkerforge?) for that issue?

 

I would really appreciate your feedback as this is getting a more and more critical issue for me.

 

Thanks!

Link zu diesem Kommentar
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Gast
Reply to this topic...

×   Du hast formatierten Text eingefügt.   Formatierung jetzt entfernen

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Dein Link wurde automatisch eingebettet.   Einbetten rückgängig machen und als Link darstellen

×   Dein vorheriger Inhalt wurde wiederhergestellt.   Clear editor

×   Du kannst Bilder nicht direkt einfügen. Lade Bilder hoch oder lade sie von einer URL.

×
×
  • Neu erstellen...