Geschrieben May 30, 2012 at 16:2130. Mai 2012 hello! thank you for providing the TCP/IP spec! i'd really prefer to have the brickd provide 2 sockets - one for "calls" (request/response) - one for "events/callbacks" (response) this would make logic much easier, when dealing with a single threaded environment (using blocking ops for "calls", and async io for "callbacks")! regards
Geschrieben May 30, 2012 at 20:4530. Mai 2012 I believe the brickd keeps track of the connections requesting events. If so you could simply open two connections and register your callbacks only on one of the connections. Then the events/callbacks should only occur on that connection.
Geschrieben May 30, 2012 at 21:1930. Mai 2012 We can't do this in general because the WIFI Extension won't be able to do this efficiently (utilizing two sockets). It would be possible to make this behavior configurable for brickd, i suppose.
Geschrieben May 31, 2012 at 10:5031. Mai 2012 Autor extending the brickd would be great! AuronX' idea is also nice! thanks
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.