vishalsleo1 Geschrieben January 19, 2022 at 13:43 Share Geschrieben January 19, 2022 at 13:43 when the bricks 2.0 imu is stable and fully calibrated (as per bricks viewer tool) then can we get the angular velocity for imu is 0.27 rad/ sec? Zitieren Link zu diesem Kommentar Share on other sites More sharing options...
borg Geschrieben January 21, 2022 at 13:27 Share Geschrieben January 21, 2022 at 13:27 The acceleration, magnetic field and angular velocity are the raw values from the sensor, they will have noise. The quaternions are determined with a fusion algorithm, they should be more stable! Zitieren Link zu diesem Kommentar Share on other sites More sharing options...
vishalsleo1 Geschrieben January 23, 2022 at 04:58 Autor Share Geschrieben January 23, 2022 at 04:58 sorry for delay, we was testing sensor ( IMU brick 2.0) with the GUI ( bricks viewer ) and taking log, as per my observation even we do the calibration as per the procedure in GUI then also when the IMU is stable there is some large value of the angular velocity of imu " 0.31 deg / sec " is coming from this sensor, Also so for the liner acceleration we get the " -0.22 m/sec" large value, we are expecting near to zero for sable IMU but why we are getting this much value, Please guide on this.. Zitieren Link zu diesem Kommentar Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.